Category Archives: value of life

Value of Life and the Infinte Doctor

Grandpa, dad and I walked hand in hand.
Grandpa, dad and I walked hand in hand.

As I have thought about the subject a lot lately, I keep coming back to what seems like a conclusion.  We all wonder how to value life, and most of us swear we have an answer.  As a patient, a father of special needs children, and a patient advocate my conclusion seems simple compared to the many theological based answers I run across.

I think the value of life is determined solely by the desire one has to live it.  I came to this conclusion thinking about what Dr. Weis whom I met with the American Board of Internal Medicine, wrote about two ways to perform the role of a doctor.  The first is as if every visit has a finite interaction duration with a predefined beginning and end.  If the doctor comes into the room, diagnoses the patient and goes about ordering/performing/giving the care which has the highest likelihood of prolonging life, then the doctor has performed the best care possible.  This is measurable/finite doctoring (sort of, if we can agree on the most effective care possible).  The doctor came in, diagnosed the condition necessitating the visit, and treated it.  That is the end of the doctor’s role in a finite model.  I note this is the current model most of our insurance uses to pay for treatments.

The second way to perform the role of a doctor is to look at the patient as a whole.  What do they want to do, and how is their condition preventing this?  Will solving the nominal cause of the visit allow the patient to resume their life as they desire?  What is it that drives them and keeps them going?  What is the patient’s answer to life’s most important question, “For what or whom do you live?” If the doctor can allow them that part of their life which they value, should not that be the goal?  Notice however in this model, the role of the doctor doesn’t end when the patient is treated for the reason they came into the visit.  In this model, the role of the doctor continues for as long as the patient values some part of their existence.  This is the infinite doctor’s role, for it has no defined end point at the time the doctor sees the patient.  It ends with a lack of desire or ability to experience what the patient values in his or her life.

As I have interacted with patients, I find many who have experiences like mine where they overcome expectations because they have something which they value in their lives.  I see patients who spend their time helping others, and the desire to do so gives them fortitude beyond what should be expected.  I see kids who want desperately to play with their family, and that gives them strength to push on long after they should have needed to stop.  If we take the time to know what we or the patients really want out of this life, I suspect we may go down very different roads than the road of trying to preserve life for as long as possible.

I note treatment under these two models can have some profoundly different outcomes.  Now think about under which model of a doctor’s role you want to be cared?

This came to a head for me last month.  My dad had been in the surgical intensive care unit for months.  It became clear he was never going to be able to get back to the parts of life he loved.  He wasn’t going to be able to go out boating and drinking with friends at the marina.  He wasn’t even likely to be able to go read a book by the water for a long time, even if things went optimally.  Yet through infection after infection and surgery after surgery he held on.  Why?  I strongly suspect he persevered because he never wanted to leave my step-mom alone.  He loved her the way we all hope to be loved.

Still, on a Friday after months in the hospital she told him it was OK to let go, and what he wanted became clear before she even left the building.  If life’s most important question is “For what do you live?” clearly his love and concern for her was his answer.  He tore off the oxygen before she even got to her car.  They put it back on him, but through the weekend it became clear he was done.  He died on the Monday after family said our good byes and stopped all medication save those comforting him.  He valued knowing his wife was OK enough to endure whatever came his way, and when reassured she was, his decision was life was not worth the discomfort. He was lucky enough to be treated at a  hospital where the ultimate goals of maintaining and preserving life meant more than a heartbeat.

I don’t doubt for a second the entire team of medical professionals at the University of Maryland Medical Center worked to preserve a chance for him and our family to return to a life with meaning.  What’s more, when that chance passed, they respected the wishes of our family to let him go and not insist on medical treatment unlikely to add value to his or our lives.  For them, I am thankful.

For my dad, we will all miss your self deprecating humor. With your passing, we will miss thousands of smiles, Hawaiian shirt sightings, deep conversations and opportunities to enjoy great food and drink. May you forever travel happy knowing you are loved.

Share

Could Versus Should, The Unasked Question

1_litt-c3--3137_750

Last week, I was interviewing, and I was asked a question for which I should have been

prepared.  Of course saying this, I realize the question is one politicians, medical professionals

and the rest of the country have been trying to answer for years, so it’s not like I expect to have

the perfect answer.  After the interview, the question stuck with me to the point where I wrote

back to the interviewers thanking them for the interview and the question which had stuck with

me after the interview.  The question is one I still find myself mulling almost a week later.

“If you had a magic wand, how would you fix the healthcare system in America?” 

 

After thanking the interviewers, I wrote this:

 

As I was going home and then later putting my kids to bed, I was thinking about the question how would I use my magic wand to fix healthcare.  While I still stand by the answers of single payer and/or universal billing system as helpful to improve aggregate societal health, it occurs to me I failed to mention fixing a large part of the problem.  These are potential band aids, but they assume many decisions stay constant.  As a society we are loathe to talk about the beginning and ending of our lives.  Sex/birth control is a taboo topic and so is death.  With our reluctance to talk about these issues as a society, we all too often fail to ever come to grips with the questions of “should.”  We instead focus on the questions of “can.”  If we can, then we should is the assumption.

 

“Can we save this limb / life?” is the question we ask instead of “Should we save this life or limb and at what cost?”  I saw this when a 21 year old friend was pinned against a guard rail by a car.  She is at the 6-month post accident point, and it is still unknown whether she will ever regain use of the leg.  For less money and pain, she could be using a prosthetic and well on her way through rehab, but the assumption was they should try to save the leg because it may work.  That was how it was presented to her despite at least a 50/50 split amongst my medical friends who say they would have wanted their own leg removed.. 

 

As a society, we do not often ask what the costs will mean for our families or society.  I doubt any of my children’s birth parents ever gave a moments thought to how much the state of MD would pay to keep their children alive and later raised.  I am personally glad they did not.  However, with such a huge portion of the cost of healthcare being accrued in end of life care to prolong life for such short periods of time, at some point society will need to come to a point where we can at least acknowledge the costs and trade offs implicit in our choices or refusal to make choices.  At some point, we need to come to a point where “should” is not simply implied, and a conversation can take place.

 

I would never imply there is a universal correct answer or formula, but if I could wave my wand, I would at least get us to a point where we could talk about what our choices really imply in terms of trade offs.  Is saving my productivity for a year worth more than the cost of a college education?  Is keeping grandma alive in a coma from which she will never wake worth more than keeping a soup kitchen open for the same amount of time?  Should we use stem cells to prolong life?  Perhaps someday we will be able to bio-engineer our systems to be resistant to certain diseases, but should we do so?

 

As I think about the question of fixing our healthcare system, I am beginning to think my assumptions in our conversation were a bit misguided.  A lot of what is trending wrong happens well outside our traditional doctors’ offices and hospitals.  I also recognize much of this is outside the scope of the board except to say the presentation of the trade offs and respecting of patients views of their own trade offs is vital for any doctor.  When I think about what I like most in my neurologist, it is not just that he answers emails.  He has also never second guessed my willingness to take the riskier medications to prolong the time I can maximize my efforts to raise my kids.

 

In any event, thank you for giving me the questions to let me better phrase what I value from my doctors. 

Share