Category Archives: education

We Need a Champion We Can Trust

Some days I am amazed at all of the help we have gotten with A through the years.
Some days I am amazed at all of the help we have gotten with A through the years.

In the past two weeks, I have sat through a class on building trust with an organization and a round table discussion between the president of the American Board of Internal Medicine and a broad cross section of patient, consumer and purchaser organizations . At first, I did not link the two topics in my head until somebody at the round table described what patients want from their doctors as “someone who will champion me and my needs.”

When I heard this, I thought it summed up why I thought so highly of my favorite doctors. Of course, I want them to know all of the latest best practices, but as a patient I have little means to ascertain whether I am getting good or bad service in terms of medical quality. What I really need is somebody whom I can trust to do the multitude of little things to make me buy in to a plan of action to improve my health. Nothing builds trust faster with me than knowing the doctor will see my needs met, even when I know I am imposing a huge burden, sometimes bigger than I feel comfortable requesting.

When I think of doctors for whom I have the highest regard, I think of our children’s primary care doctor. Early in our fostering, my wife took our oldest to see her. Not only did she read through the medical history (2 big, full binders), she asked probing questions, followed up with requests for medications, gave needed referrals, and finally she filled out a huge application with a long letter detailing A’s medical history in an effort to get A into REM. REM is a program for rare and expensive case management. That A was ultimately denied did not matter. Her effort identified her as a champion, as somebody who had our kid’s interest in mind. As she has run for public office in recent years, it’s with a heavy heart we always vote for her. We vote for her because she is a champion, but we cringe at the thought of losing her energy and time as a doctor. She is one of the people I think of when I think of a quote from Andrew Bridge in Hope’s Boy,

“Some people are born for battles. Their bravery endures, regardless of frailty or strength. They are the ones we look to and our admiring hearts tell us, ‘They’ll know what to do.’ They are the great winners and losers of history. We remember them less for their outcomes than for their glorious acts. And, with the gentle wash of time, they become our heroes.”

When I think about my neurologists whom I have trusted, I think about why I trusted them. I trusted them because I felt my experience mattered to them. I felt as if they listened rather than heard what I said. They answered my questions and coaxed out what I valued in my treatments and life. I was and am willing to risk greater harm in order to preserve my abilities and life today. The best doctors have listened and have been responsive when I asked for help, and in turn I try not to ask often (a point of contention between me and my wife who thinks I need to ask more).

As I reflect back on the trust class and ABIM’s goal of requiring certified doctors to look at their own practices with a critical eye towards improving patient care, I come back to the comment from the round table. We patients want our doctors to champion our healthcare with us. In order for a patient to feel this bond, we have to feel trust.

I will readily admit much of healthcare today is set against the formation of this trust. Doctors have very limited time with each patient. The paperwork and administrative functions they and their staff are called to do by government, insurance and other organizations seems daunting. As a patient, all I can say is I am asking for a champion and a champion’s time/attention. I know I ask for a lot, always have. I just try not to ask often.

When thinking about how I would want the medical profession to change and how we as patients could measure a doctor’s trustworthiness which includes both intent and ability, I realized there are a few things I need to feel my doctor knows to do and how. I want them to know not only what treatments I may need, but how to chose amongst options and how to obtain needed treatments. The best have been ones who know how to make this easiest for me in terms of money and time, like the doctor who suggested I contact the pharmaceutical company for copay assistance. I want doctors to know how to be approachable. For some this comes easy, but I have certainly seen those for whom it is hard. I want a medical profession where criticism is seen as opportunity for improvement and thus constantly sought at all levels. The openness to being eternal students is critical. We can all improve

There is a kid’s riddle, “What do you call the person who graduated last in their class at Medical school?” The answer is, of course, “doctor.” In my ideal world, the follow-up question would be what do you call them and all the others who graduated ahead of them?” The answer should be just as obvious, “students.”

Share

Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education

Last week, I was lucky enough to attend a two day workshop/conference at the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Medicine (http://www.iom.edu/activities/global/innovationhealthprofeducation.aspx) .

I have to confess after looking at who was attending, I was a bit intimidated wondering what I could contribute.  After all, I was there as a patient, and there were health professionals from all over the world.  I came away feeling like I had learned a ton I never would have guessed about healthcare and feeling like I had contributed to quite a few of the conversations both from the patient and project management perspectives.

As the second day was ending, I wrote down a few of my take aways:

1) The most surprising stat I heard through two days was 70% of errors in healthcare come in handoffs of care. The reasons are many, but I keep thinking a lot of them could avoided.  From an outsider’s vantage, it seems a lot of these errors could be avoided if there was an easily accessible way for healthcare providers to see the rest of what was going on with the patient’s medical care.  Of course, there are probably some structural problems within our system making it harder.  For example, if we had a single coding/billing system for all medical procedures, maybe it would help.

I know the Census codes businesses using an 8 digit code with the first couple of digits expressing the sector and each subsequent digit getting more descriptive.  Could a similar system allow for quick browsing of a medical record to quickly see current treatments?  Of course this improvement would be most useful if the record were portable and/or available for the entire healthcare team of patients

2) When it comes to considering changes in healthcare and healthcare education, insurance companies should probably be at the table because they probably have the most inclusive view of the system. The funny part of thinking this during the forum was talking with a representative from United Healthcare over the weekend.  It turns out they are in the process of trying to come up with a coding system to account for all healthcare procedures, even in areas they do not cover like dentistry.  I was happy to hear this as I was about to propose “somebody” needs to come up with a system.

3) In a related thought, I think insurance companies need to come up with a way to reimburse healthcare providers for services provided outside the traditional office/hospital visit model.  I know how important it is to me to have a neurologist willing to answer emails.  When I’ve asked him about how it is billed, he’s told me he is OK because his is a salaried position.  Still, from a billing standpoint, isn’t our email a more efficient way to handle every day questions medical problems?  How many more healthcare situations could be handled with less overhead?  Many of the best doctors are providing their services outside the standard models.  They need to be encouraged to continue.

4) These non-standard ways to provide healthcare speak to a need to better integrate patients’ needs and experience into the shaping of healthcare policy.  Patients are ever more connected.  We read more about our conditions and healthcare.  While this can give us vital information allowing us to track more of our condition, it can also lead us down many dead ends.  Quite simply, we often don’t know what we don’t know and often what we don’t know is the all important context.
(continued on next page)

5) This thought leads to how knowledge should be gained, and it is not a question limited to patients.  The session going over changes taking place in health education were some of my favorites.  The traditional model of advanced education is based on people in seats, but it is under attack from various on-line services.  If Stanford is teaching on-line high school, and many colleges are offering ever more on-line course work why should anyone assume medical school will always be taught in class rooms?

When I think of my job and all of the people we have hired out of college, I know we always have months before they are up to speed.  I know many of the healthcare professionals at the forum were expressing similar experiences.  The schools are all there to teach towards the exams.  I know we all expect a broad base of knowledge from our doctors, but does the discrepancy between what is encountered with real patients and what is on the exams speak to a fundamental flaw in our healthcare education model.

I tend toward the “no” camp, but I recognize my own bias having graduated from a traditional college.  While I use little of what I learned there, I think the value of traditional education is learning how to learn and more importantly how to question.  The base knowledge is the important launch point, and it’s my hope medical schools still provide the base for our nurses, doctors and other health professionals to make informed readings of new information.  They need the context we patients lack.  What is less clear to me is whether the class room is the best medium for conveying the information in all situations.

6) All of this lead to what seemed a general consensus there should be some general metrics to assess how current healthcare providers, their teachers, and institutions in general are in terms of their knowledge of current best practices.  These metrics might better inform us which methods are most efficient.

7) I was struck in a few of the break out sessions by the frequency people expressed a view that health care systems in the U.S. and elsewhere are becoming more “community based” and less hospital system based.  This drove me back to the 70% of errors stat I heard on day one.  If 70% of errors in healthcare come from hand offs in care, won’t a decentralized healthcare system exasperate this problem?  I hope not, but I don’t know how to avoid it without other structural changes in our system.

Finally, I can not say how thankful I am to Patientslikeme.com for suggesting my name and getting me invited.  I was planning on taking a couple of days off to go, but it turned out to be an incredibly stimulating way to spend a couple of furlough days.  I would also like to thank all the people who invited me to the forum.

Share